Hi
I had a dream. I was asleep under a big table in a large
room. The smell was 16th century
Cambridge. There were lots of shoes.
First Shoes
Dr Thornton, please sum up the case against Mr
Holland.
Second Shoes
Thank you chairman.
The events
that occurred on the evening of 22nd November 2011 in and around the
Lady Mitchell Hall lecture theatre are essentially undisputed. Mr Owen Holland, a member of this university,
led an action that prevented Mr David Willetts, a government minister, from
delivering a lecture.
His action recklessly and/or intentionally impeded free speech
within the Precincts of the University.
Mr Holland chose
to act as leader and spokesman. It is
appropriate that he be rusticated for one term.
First Shoes Thank
you.
Dr Mackenzie,
your final statement on behalf of Mr Holland.
Third Shoes As Dr Thornton said, the events are
essentially undisputed. However Mr
Holland was perhaps more chorus leader than spokesman.
Mr Holland, and many others, held and hold
principled objections to certain legislative changes. Mr Willetts came to Cambridge on 22nd
November last as a politician, a government minister and a proponent of those
changes. Robust demonstration of political views and
anger is an expected and important part of democracy. Mr Holland played his part in what he
believed, and still believes, was legitimate political demonstration.
By inviting Mr Willetts to take part, at that
time, in that lecture series, the University had indicated that it accepted
that The Idea of the University has a
political facet.
Whilst maintaining his position on the issue
of principle, Mr Holland wishes me to express his regrets concerning the
tactical planning and implementation of the protest that evening.
He and his associates failed to extend
courtesy and consideration to the many in the audience who had given up an
evening to hear and to question Mr Willetts.
He, and his chorus, bored and alienated the audience with an overlong dirge.
The actions were humourless, threatening and
counter-productive. Mr Holland wishes
that he had written and delivered a short and witty piece on the lines of:
You are rich father Willetts, the young man ......................
If he and his colleagues had then remained
silent, the audience would have laughed, and possibly applauded. Mr
Willetts would have spoken. Questions would
have been sharp.
Mr Holland has learned that skill and wit and
good manners need to be added to conviction and energy.
First Shoes Thank
you. Mr Holland, Dr Thornton has presented
a convincing case and has recommended rustication for one term.
However, Dr
Mackenzie, on your behalf, has raised and conceded a probably more significant
point. On 22nd November last,
you acted without courtesy, consideration and commonsense. You also failed to use the intellectual
skills, the wisdom and the good humour that is required from and expected of a
person of your ability at the University of Cambridge.
Mr Holland, you
are rusticated for two terms, namely Lent Term and Easter Term 2012. We look forward to seeing you in October 2012.
I woke up. So it was only a dream.
Breakfast calls.
Paws4Now